The District Of Coyoacãƒâ¡n To The South Is Named For What Animal?

Voting is underway in Southward Dakota ahead of the June 7 principal election to make up one's mind a host of political contests — from national offices to ballot measures — that will shape the ballot in the 2020 full general election subsequently this year.

And registered Republicans in the newly formed Legislative District 9, which encompasses the city of Hartford, portions of northwest Sioux Falls and the rural areas of Minnehaha County in betwixt have no shortage of candidates seeking party nominations for country Senate and House of Representatives.

Here'southward a await at the candidates Republican voters in District 9 will see on their ballots, and where they stand on topics ranging from Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg'south impeachment to vaccine mandates and sales tax cuts.

More:Hither's a look at who's running for South Dakota Senate, House in Sioux-Falls expanse races

Considering no Democrats or non-Republican candidates are seeking country legislative offices in the District nine senate election, the top Republican vote-getter in the GOP primary senate race will be seated every bit a Legislator side by side year. The top two vote-getters in the GOP main for land Business firm volition advance to the general ballot.

The Argus Leader submitted a series of questions to all candidates who will appear on the master ballots, with a request that responses be kept to 100 words or less for each respond. Responses have been edited for grammar and clarity.

The questions:

For the Senate–

1. The Senate is scheduled to hold an impeachment trial for Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg in late June for allegedly committing acts of malfeasance while in office, charges that stem from a 2020 crash investigation into the death of Joe Boever.

   Given what you know virtually Ravnsborg's conduct, which included lying to law enforcement most his cellphone usage the night of the crash and using members of his staff to glean information near how the investigation might exist conducted, do you support the House'south determination to impeach, and would y'all vote to convict at trial?

2. Gov. Noem this year successfully blocked an endeavour to reduce the state sales tax rate by .5% and a separate effort to eliminate sales tax on groceries too failed to earn passage.

   How do you feel about the governor'due south cautious arroyo to protecting existing regime revenues amid tape-setting surplus in state coffers in recent years?

3. Legislators in 2022 spent hours debating whether land government should prohibit employers from mandating the COVID-19 vaccine.

   Where did you fall in that policy argue and why?

For the Firm –

1.  Ravnsborg was impeached in the land House on April 12 later on 20 months of controversy that followed the death of Joe Boever, killed in fatal car v. pedestrian crash in which Ravnsborg was driving. How would you accept voted on impeachment and why?

2. Gov. Noem this year successfully blocked an attempt to reduce the state sales tax rate by .5% and a separate endeavour to eliminate sales tax on groceries also failed to earn passage.

   How practise you experience well-nigh the governor's cautious approach to protecting existing government revenues amid record-setting surplus in country coffers in recent years?

3. Legislators in 2022 spent hours debating whether state government should prohibit employers from mandating the COVID-19 vaccine.

   What is governments role in refereeing relationships between employers and employees with regard to vaccinations and individual rights?

Senate candidate responses:

Marker Willadsen

Age: 67

Profession/identify of employment: Retired Insurance agent

Prior public/customs service: State legislator

Family info: Wife Suzanne for 45 years, 3 grown children, 12 grandchildren

No. 1 : I voted for impeachment because I believe the people of South Dakota should be able to access the information that comes out in the trial and make their ain conclusions.  It would be inappropriate for me to answer the second half of your question, or anyone else for that matter, as we accept not heard the testimony of the trial.

No. ii : I believe that the Governor and the Legislature acted appropriately by taking the conservative road in defeating these two measures again.  I was there in 2011 when nosotros had to vote to cut funding of programs by x% because the funds were not there.  Being conservative is a much better approach in my opinion.

No. iii: I certainly did not spend hours and hours on this debate.  I think our Governor lead us in the correct direction by keeping the state open for business, and trying to stay out of the mode of business concern, and permit business organisation make their own decisions near what is correct for them.

Brent "B.R." Hoffman

Age: 58

Profession/place of employment: Retired Military, Writer, Contractor Prior public/community service: Military, Volunteer, City Quango, School Board, CASA

Family info: Widower, 2 children

No. 1: In short, I support the conclusion to impeach and remove Mr. Ravnsborg from part, not considering of the charges or the politics, but because I believe character matters. Our elected officials should gear up a positive case of integrity, honor and trustworthiness, regardless of whether we concur on issues.

In my opinion, his actions were not what we should await of our state's highest law enforcement official and reflect poorly on the function. I'grand sorry for Mr. Boever'south family, and they have my prayers. Mr. Ravnsborg as well has my prayers, but he does non accept my vote.

No. 2 : Whether our swell country is faced with surpluses or shortfalls, it's always a good time to promote financial responsibility. I strongly back up our constitutional requirement for a balanced budget, and I believe nosotros should work together to eliminate wasteful spending while prioritizing infrastructure and didactics.

South Dakota already has a good taxation climate (ranking ninth of the 50 states), just nosotros can always do better. With that in mind, I respectfully disagree with my opponent's votes to increase taxes, and I support returning tax dollars to the citizens who earned it.

No. three: In my feel in business, and even every bit a military officeholder or volunteer, authorities has not proven itself an effective referee and problem-solver. As Ronald Reagan once said, "Regime doesn't solve issues, it subsidizes them."

These are non easy problems to solve, and we should care for each other with respect and acknowledge we each accept opinions equally to what is right and fair. That said, where the rights of governments, organizations and individuals conflict, I believe we must champion the rights of the individual, consistent with the U.S. Constitution.

House candidates

Ken Teunissen

Historic period: 73

Profession/place of employment: Retired

Prior public/community service: War machine

Family info: wife, half-dozen children, 17 grandchildren, and 4 corking grandchildren

No. 1: The State's Attorney should be held to college standards than most Due south Dakotans.  I would have voted with the majority of the house to impeach the Attorney Full general.  We need to prove the citizens of Southward Dakota that all elected officials are held to the aforementioned standards as anybody else.

No. 2: Ane of the key problems of my platform is limited authorities and regime overreach.  We need to be adept stewards of the taxpayers money, which includes looking for ways to reduce government spending.  At the same fourth dimension, nosotros have a responsibility to programme for future potential shortfalls to avoid having to ask the voters for future tax increases.  I would piece of work closely with the governor on striking a balance of working with the state's upkeep and providing the services that the citizens wait and require.

No. 3 : Neither the state not federal regime should tell any business how to operate. Individual concern owners should exist allowed to run their own business without additional government overreach. Employees so have the choice whether they want to work inside the set guidelines in the same mode the consumers have the choice if they want to do business concern with these employers. No business is allowed to interruption federal employment laws, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Act that protects employees.

Bethany Soye (incumbent)

Historic period: 30

Profession/identify of employment: Attorney/Banking, mother

Prior public/community service: Youth sports motorbus, reading tutor

Family: Married man Ryan, son Edison - 9 months old

No. ane : As an attorney, I hold with the articulate and disarming standard of proof the committee adamant was necessary for manufactures of impeachment to issue. I do not believe the facts that were presented meet this standard. Despite over a twelvemonth of investigation, at that place was insufficient evidence to accuse more than ii traffic misdemeanors. Neither of these offenses was committed "in office or by virtue of the role."

When I was elected I took an oath to back up the Constitution of the Usa including the Right to Due Process. This correct was violated from the very beginning of the investigation. The Legislature is setting a very dangerous precedent if this is the way that investigations are immune to go on.

No. 2 : If we aren't willing to cutting taxes when we have a record-setting surplus, nosotros volition never cut taxes. The legislature fabricated a promise to the people in 2016 when they raised the state sales taxation .five%. The atmospheric condition for the repeal have been met and yet nosotros reject to reduce the revenue enhancement. I of my colleagues stated it quite well: government doesn't stop eating when it's full; it stops when there is nada left to eat. 2022 gave the Republican majority a great opportunity to put our money where our mouth is, but instead we pumped more than coin into the government motorcar. I will continue to advocate for true fiscal conservatism and keeping our promise to lower taxes.

No. 3: I supported codifying individual exemptions because our American Democracy was founded to protect individual rights. Big companies have essentially become an arm of the bureaucratic state and are used to enforce rules the federal government has no authorisation to effect on its own. Certainly business owners have individual rights, but their rights must be balanced with the rights of their employees. We already have protections for employees regarding discrimination, workplace safety, etc. How is it proper for the regime to protect individual liberties in these areas but not when it comes to the freedom of censor and actual integrity? That makes no sense to me.

Jesse Fonkert

Historic period: 29

Profession/identify of employment: Economic Development, President & CEO, Sioux Metro Growth Alliance

Prior public/customs service:Downtown Rotary, Sioux 52 Mentoring Initiative, Article of furniture Mission of South Dakota, Sioux Empire United Style Emerging Leaders, and Downtown Hartford Committee, West Fundamental Education Foundation, West Central Junior Achievement, Hartford Jamboree Days Commission and Augustana Academy Immature Alumni.

Family info: Wife Kelsey are expecting start child in May

No. 1: Based on the data, I would have voted to impeach Jason Ravnsborg. While I understand some believe he did non commit an impeachable criminal offence, the evidence is clear. While under interrogation, the Attorney Full general misrepresented his cell phone usage while driving. The Attorney Full general was negligent while operating a vehicle, which resulted in the death of Jason Boever. In South Dakota, we expect the best from our public servants and we deserve better.

No. 2: Skilful governance requires an even hand in both years of surplus and deficit. South Dakota'due south economical situation is a product of such governance. While it might seem warranted to eliminate these revenues during years like 2022, we demand to take time to empathise the unintended consequences of eliminating taxes that help fund

pedagogy and other services so we don't have to raise taxes in the future. I fully support the Governor's position on both.

No. 3: The government's role should be minimal in refereeing the relationship between employers and employees regarding vaccinations. If an employer wants to either mandate or not mandate, that is their choice. We live in a free-market place economic system and we demand to keep information technology that way. Thankfully, we have a stiff economy with tape-low unemployment, which allows employees to be selective in where they work and forces employers to be competitive.

Source: https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2022/05/02/south-dakota-district-9-republicans-house-senate-june-7-election-2022/7441490001/

Posted by: chentropir.blogspot.com

Share this post